| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because it failed the FA nomination and I want to improve it in order to fulfill the criteria. Please list everything you think that prevents the article from becoming featured. Thanks in advance.--Retrohead (talk) 17:32, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
- Perhaps the second paragraph of 'Commercial performance' actually belongs better with 'Accolades and legacy'.
- Anything usable here #1. Metallica - MASTER OF PUPPETS? I have seen this site used in the FA Reign in Blood.
- How about here Master Of Puppets Reviews?
- Lead: "Metallica honored the album's twentieth anniversary in 2006 by playing it in its entirety". I don't see this elsewhere in the article. Lead should be a summary of sourced content. Lead could also be grouped a bit better, say chronologically. BollyJeff | talk 20:12, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- I've already used the first link as a source—it's actually Martin Popoff's book on the 500 greatest heavy metal albums. As for the Ultimate Guitar review, I'm pretty sure that it won't pass the source check during the FA nomination. As for the album being performed in its entirety in 2006, it's mentioned in the 'Live performances'.--Retrohead (talk) 19:52, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Question: It didn't actually fail the FAR right? It was closed due to inactivity. Have you tried inviting the PR volunteers? or would it be better for them to take part in the future FAR? -Joel. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 10:32, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the advice, I'll be more active in lobbying for FA reviewers this time.--Retrohead (talk) 19:52, 26 April 2015 (UTC)