Wikipedia:Peer review/McLaren MP4-30/archive1

McLaren MP4-30

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to see it become a Featured Article some day. It has been accepted as a Good Article and has had content included as part of a DYK in June. I am looking for anything that the article needs to make it viable as a Featured Article.

Thanks, Prisonermonkeys (talk) 06:20, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by MWright96

Images

All images will need alt text per WP:ALT
- The only images that do not have captions are included as multi-images; the captions apply to all images in the group.
  - There was no issue with the captions. The images need alternative text to be added. T v x1 00:41, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Just a query, why are all the images all placed at right-hand side of the article?
- That's just the way it has always been done in similar, related articles. I never really had a reason to question it.

Early development

The FIA needs to be spelt out with the acronyms in brackets

Power unit — Honda RA615H

"Honda introduced several radical concepts to the engine that allowed them to develop a smaller engine that weighed just 145 kg (320 lb)" -

reptition of engine
- Fixed.

Remove the acronyms for kinetic entergy recovery system since its only used once in the article

In-season development

Do the same for drag reduction system

Asian and American rounds

Wikilink safety car for non-racing readers
- Fixed.
"Pits" is slang. Reword to pit lane
- Working on it.
Remove the wikilink for Felipe Massa on the second occassion he is mentioned
- Fixed.
Do the same for Pastor Maldonado
- Fixed.

References

Ref 94 is missing the work
- Fixed.
The work in Ref 121 has a second .com which needs removing
- Fixed.
It would be a good idea to archive the sources to prevent link rot
- Probably, but I don't know how to do it.
  - See:Help:Using_the_Wayback_Machine. WP:CHECKLINKS can be helpful too. T v x1 00:43, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Is F1 Today and This is F1 reliable sources?
- I wasn't aware that they were being used. Will look into it.
- Okay, they're fixed.

That is what I found. Overall a good work. MWright96 (talk) 13:35, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@MWright96 — updated as needed, others in progress. Thanks for the tips. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 12:17, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]