Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I want to submit it for a good article consideration.
Thanks, Chihciboy (talk) 17:01, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Chihciboy: I would actually recommend going straight to GAN. The article overall looks in really good shape. The only thing that's jumping out at me is that you have some statements with four citations in a row. You should bundle them, remove the least reliable one, or move the citations closer to the content they support. Good luck! Catrìona (talk) 18:57, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks, Catrìona! Will rearrange the citation as soon as I'm available. Chihciboy (talk) 16:30, 14 September 2018 (UTC)