| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion is closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I feel like it has potential on being a featured article. I want to make this article as good as possible to have it nominated for FA.
Thanks, GeraldWL ✉ 17:25, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- This article looks kind of decent. The one major thing I noticed is the lack of a reception section. The reception section describes what people thought about the show in general. Before you ask, no, you don't have to merge the controversy section with the reception section as the controversy section has enough details to be its own section. Look at WP:RECEPTION for help with this section, or look at other featured articles about movies in WP:FA#Films for more ideas of what you can do. Lazman321 (talk) 14:34, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Lazman321, done. And also I think the first paragraph of the Reception section is not really needed. Also added more on the release, soundtrack, plot, and the accolades.
- I think that the article still has some minor issues on grammar. In the statue's image caption: "the name "Arjuna" refers to the two personalities: strong and crippling." I refer "crippling" as to being weak. Do you think it should be replaced with "weak" for clarity, or can you think of any better words? GeraldWL ✉ 16:17, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah, I think you might want to replace "crippling" with "week", or maybe even "crippled." "Crippling" implies someone who is strong enough to cripple others. Anyway, those are my two cents. Lazman321 (talk) 03:35, 27 August 2020 (UTC)