| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion has been closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to know whether editors would be in favour of Gapes being nominated as a Good Article or otherwise. As a member of the Independent Group, Gapes will obviously be the subject of increased notability as time goes on.
Thanks, Bangalamania (talk) 16:24, 29 March 2019 (UTC)