Wikipedia:Peer review/Military history of Gibraltar during World War II/archive1

Military history of Gibraltar during World War II

I recently created this article and spent quite some time improving it - all feedback is welcome. I would love to see it featured as a good article yet I think that some comments/opinions intended to provide useful information for future decisions and development would really be beneficial. Chris Buttigieg 18:46, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Automated Peer Review

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.^[?]
There may be an applicable infobox for this article. For example, see Template:Infobox Biography, Template:Infobox School, or Template:Infobox City.^[?] (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space -   between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 45km, use 45 km, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 45 km.^[?]
Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at Wikipedia:Guide to layout.^[?]
There are a few sections that are too short and that should be either expanded or merged.
As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space in between. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]^[?]
Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.^[?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Davnel03 20:56, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done - apart from the lead; that will take me a bit longer. Chris Buttigieg 09:51, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2nd Automated Peer Review

Let's see if the Peer Review tool brings up any other problems:

Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.^[?]
There may be an applicable infobox for this article. For example, see Template:Infobox Biography, Template:Infobox School, or Template:Infobox City.^[?] (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space -   between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 45 km, use 45 km, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 45 km.^[?]
There are a few sections that are too short and that should be either expanded or merged.
Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.^[?]

Hope this helps. Thanks, Davnel03 11:54, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done -- Chris Buttigieg 15:02, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]