This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because…
…it's time for some other eyes to be laid on this article. Specifically, I had trouble writing the Appellate court section - it's hard to summarize a judge's opinion. In addition, I would like other people's opinions on the article's "content completeness", especially the Aftermath (Consequences?) section.
Thanks! —Rob (talk) 21:51, 11 February 2008 (UTC)