| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I hope it become a good article and maybe a featured article
Thanks, NoD'ohnuts (talk) 18:29, 23 October 2010 (UTC)Nod'onuts
- Well, for starters, the article needs to have coverage by some WikiProject before it can proceed with the nomination. Second, as the season isn't over yet, the article is going to be unstable, so it'll be bad time to nominate it again. Third, the lead is too short. Secret Saturdays (talk to me)what's new? 02:49, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- Just to clear something up, WikiProjects are not a requirement for, um, anything on WP. Articles can (and have) gone through PR, GAN, FAC and pretty much every other process on WP without having project banners on their talk page. Dana boomer (talk) 14:35, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
- A featured article needs to be comprehensive and well-researched. There is no information on reception from audience/viewer ratings or critics. The main thing that the article needs is more information. As Secret Saturdays said above, the season must be over before you can even think about nominating this for GA. Adabow (talk · contribs) 22:20, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- The criteria for both GA and FA both include some measure of completeness of coverage. WP:WIAGA requires broad coverage in GAs, while WP:WIAFA requires that the article be comprehensive in its coverage of the topic. The article currently does not even say how many episodes the second season will have. Assuming it has as many as the first season (24), only 6 or 7 have aired to date, so only a quarter to less than a third of the episodes have aired. This is not ready for GAN or FAC. Why not work on Season One? Ruhrfisch ><>°° 02:35, 3 November 2010 (UTC)