| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I think this article (Morden tube station), has the potential to reach a featured article status so I would like to know what improvements should be made or none. :p
Thanks, Vincent60030 (talk) 15:48, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
- Vincent, the article only went through the good article nomination process in November (see here), so it's in fairly good condition and the peer review buttons on the right don't show anything much to worry about. Whilst it is not an absolute requirement, the FAC process largely operates on the assumption that the nominator will be a significant contributor to the article - so that they can address any issues arising. At the moment, I'm the main contributor (42% of edits and 76.1% of the text); taking this to FAC may be something I do in the future.--DavidCane (talk) 18:17, 15 March 2015 (UTC)