Wikipedia:Peer review/Mozilla Thunderbird/archive1
The page organization and content is similar to that of Mozilla Firefox, which is a featured article. But I think it needs more content, which is quite hard as this application doesn't have as much attention as Mozilla Firefox. The ultimate goal is to (of course) make it a feature article. ;-) --minghong 07:57, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
I share your feeling about content, the format is very good, but the content is a bit thin. In addition to trying to expand the existing sections you could add a section on criticisms, from a quick google seach it seems there are stability problems if you have massive amounts of mail etc. --nixie 00:35, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
- Yup, definately. But since I don't have any knowledge about the criticisms, the section isn't created yet. --minghong 18:19, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
- Agreed, there are a few grammatical flow errors throughout the article that make it hard to read as well. MyNameIsNotBob 08:20, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)