Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed. |
.
I've listed this article for peer review because I want to promote it to GA.
Thanks, RRD13 দেবজ্যোতি (talk) 11:14, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
- Comments from Tom (LT)
Thanks for your edits to this article, and what an interesting article it is! I've had a look at the article and also the previous GA nomination. All good articles are reviewed against six criteria here: WP:GA?. Here are my suggestions to improve this article:
- Reword this away from 'brainwashed': "he brainwashed them then Quli Khan was responsible for the due of their salaries"
- Include, if relevant, a "Legacy" section
- Include more WP:WIKILINKs -- as a reader I do not understand all the terminology about government postings and responsibilities, and links to relevant articles (or even dictionary entries at wiktionary) would be appreciated.
- Issues with sourcing and prose identified in the last GA review still stand and can be read there. I note the article has not been edited after said review, so I suggest that may be a helpful place to start
I hope this helps. WikiProject India may have some enthusiastic editors who are happy to help you, so you can try asking there as well. Cheers, --Tom (LT) (talk) 23:56, 30 January 2016 (UTC)