This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because it's a "B" on the quality assessment scale, and I'd like to get detailed feedback to help bring it up the ladder, eventually to an "FA".
Thanks, Lquilter (talk) 19:17, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR t 02:24, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- Wow, I've never before considered an automated script my peer. How nice that they've advanced so far. Time to go work with the peer review process, it seems, if automated scripts are the sole "peer review". --Lquilter (talk) 15:02, 25 February 2008 (UTC)