Wikipedia:Peer review/National emblem of Belarus/archive3
I have made some recent additions to the article, but I still would like to see some guidance on helping this article Featured. I have sent it through peer review twice, but the last one was responded only by a automatic script. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 02:05, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
- (again) Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, AZ t 02:13, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
- Comment-- an automated review is not a peer review. Why is this here? Bastiq▼e demandez 02:22, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
- I did some of the "suggested" edits, and I am sent an email to use a pic I found on Flickr of the border post. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 05:14, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
- Looks pretty good overall. "The way of carrying out the referendum was heavily criticized by the opposition" could do with citing. "Some claim that this failure to win a majority is a violation of the Law, but the imperfection and incompleteness of the Belarusian Law cannot resolve the issue." That sentence is a bit unclear - do the people who claim it is a violation also claim Belarusian law is imperfect and incomplete, or are the comments on the law supposed to be factual. Either way, it also needs citing. Trebor 21:40, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
- I removed the statement about the "Belarusian law is imperfect.." and I cited the rest of your points. I listed one of the complaints by the opposition and cited that and your first point. I added a cite to the second point, since it is true that while a majority of the population did not vote for the symbols, the many people who did vote on it did. Thanks again. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 22:02, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
- Good stuff. I gave the article a full read-through and it seems good - nothing jumps out at me to be improved. It might be time to try for featured article again. Trebor 22:15, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
- Going to. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 23:06, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks. :) User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 23:32, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
- Good luck ;) Trebor 23:34, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks. :) User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 23:32, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
- Going to. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 23:06, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
- Good stuff. I gave the article a full read-through and it seems good - nothing jumps out at me to be improved. It might be time to try for featured article again. Trebor 22:15, 5 November 2006 (UTC)