Wikipedia:Peer review/Neo-Renaissance/archive1

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program. They may or may not be accurate for the article in question (due to possible javascript errors/uniqueness of articles). If the following suggestions are completely incorrect about the article, please drop a note on my talk page.

Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at WP:LEAD. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.

Per WP:CONTEXT and WP:MOSDATE, months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.

This has been fixed thanks to bobblewik's tool. Joelito (talk) 03:26, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There may be an applicable infobox for this article. For example, see Template:Infobox Biography, Template:Infobox School, or Template:Infobox City. (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)

Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space -   between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 18mm, use 18 mm, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 18 mm.

There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. For example,
- it has been
- correctly
- might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already too, please ~~strike~~ this comment).

As is done in WP:FOOTNOTE, for footnotes, the footnote should be located right after the punctuation mark, such that there is no space inbetween. For example, change blah blah [2]. to blah blah.[2]

Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that the it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 2a.
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions (and the javascript checklist; see the last paragraph in the lead) for further ideas.
Thanks, Andy _t 00:59, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Could I just point out, this is in fact one of a series of pages on 19th century revival styles which like this page are still under construction. A collaboration between Ghirla and myself. This is still being researched, and is a long way from completion. Hence PR, or indeed any other form of review is very premature! Giano | talk 10:01, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I second Giano here. Please give us some time. --Ghirla ^-трёп- 10:15, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]