Wikipedia:Peer review/Nigel Boddice/archive1

Nigel Boddice

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because… I would like to receive feedback on how I could improve this article to B class or even GA standard. Any thoughts would be appreciated, I'm not looking for any specific areas of feedback. This is my first peer review submition, so sorry if I do anything wrong. Thanks a bunch, Schminnte (talk) 17:38, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Z1720

Comments after a quick skim.

Typically, ledes do not have citations, per WP:LEDECITE. Are these needed?
There are lots of small, one paragraph sections throughout the article, which is not recommended per MOS:OVERSECTION
Each of those listed articles in "Honours and awards" needs a citation.
Ref 40 title should not be in all caps
Ref 18 needs more information.

I hope this helps. Z1720 (talk) 03:08, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Z1720: Thanks for all your help. I've tried to implement these changes, wondering if there's anything else? I would also love your opinion on the quality of the article, as I've asked many editors who just link me to a MOS page. Schminnte (talk) 08:46, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Schminnte: I haven't done a deep reading into the article, but from taking a glance I would recommend merging those short sections in the Careers section (maybe removing the level 3 headings). I also suggest adding more information to the article, as it seems a little scarce. WP:LIBRARY, Google Scholar, archive.org and Internet searches on various platforms (Google, Bing, Duck Duck Go, etc.) might yield more sources. Z1720 (talk) 02:03, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Z1720: Thanks again. Funny thing is I can't actually use the Wikipedia library yet sadly. I'll try to implement what you're saying however. Schminnte (talk) 08:09, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]