| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion has been closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to bring it to GA-status and could some really use some advice.
Thanks, Kurtis (talk) 14:56, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- Kurtis, just a few pointers from me:
- I'd take a look at the article structure first of all. In my mind, I'd have the following sections: Background (where you can talk about recording etc) > Music (where you can talk about the composition & the songs) > Release (dates, formats, territories, cover, charts etc) > Reception (critical response, accolades, awards) > Legacy (maybe - you've got some of this at the end of the 'overview' section currently) > Track listing > Personnel. Something like that anyway
- I'd write the lead last, and use WP:LEAD as a guide
- You've got some unsourced content in there at the moment (e.g. all of the 'Overview' section)
- Ref #15 needs some attention
- I'd try to find a few more reviews, if possible
- Hope this helps! :) — sparklism hey! 12:37, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for the tips, I'll do my best to work my way up from them. This is my first attempt at a GA, so it's going to take some getting used to. Here's hoping it all goes well. Kurtis (talk) 03:30, 14 February 2016 (UTC)