| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because it's my first article and was unsure of the quality of it, specifically I think the sources might need to be improved since it is quite difficult to find the original official source of information such as track listings.
I'm very passionate about learning to make well-communicated, organised and quality content so I thought making this relevant page (since I had been looking it for myself when discovering it didn't exist yet,) was a good starting point.
Thanks, Crushedpixel
- Comment Shouldn't be titled "Outrun (album)"? Technically, it still being an album. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 06:33, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
Comment: I realise that this is your first article, and that you are likely to be a little uncertain at the moment about the process of article development. Basically, peer review is for articles where a substantial amount of work has been accomplished, when the article is well on the way to being a finished product. The review is the means for polishing up the article into its final form. In this case, the article looks hardly begun. This page lists a large number of music album articles which are fully developed. They represent the sort of thing you should be aiming at, and as you will see, your article in its present form does not compare. You should for the time being concentrate on expanding the article, and bring it back for review when much more of the developmenta;l work is done.
As for finding the appropriate sources, I don't myself work on album articles, but a study of finished articles should reveal for you the kind of sources where information can be found. Don't be afraid to ask for help from one or other of the editors experienced in writing this kind of article. Brianboulton (talk) 21:32, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
- Comment Important links may be found at WP:ALBUMS#Departments. Regards.--Tomcat (7) 13:19, 29 January 2013 (UTC)