- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for October 2008.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I am trying to bring this to FA status. It has previously failed, but it was mentioned that I should bring this here.
Thanks, the editorofthewiki (talk/contribs/editor review) 10:55, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Comment - note that there needs to be 14 days between a not promoted FAC and listing at PR. Ealdgyth - Talk 14:51, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
- Oh yeah, that stupid rule. I guess I could withdraw this, because the only real problem with the article is that it needed copyediting, and I'm getting no help here. the editorofthewiki (talk/contribs/editor review) 19:59, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
I started a copy-edit of this article, and left inline comments in places. Address them as necessary. Dabomb87 (talk) 01:52, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
- For the fist, they really were related ideas, so I kept them. Other than that, done. the editorofthewiki (talk/contribs/editor review) 10:57, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
- Copyedited remainder of article, with more inline comments. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:37, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
- The link for putchists was there to expain itself. Other than that, done. the editorofthewiki (talk/contribs/editor review) 04:09, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
- Copyedited remainder of article, with more inline comments. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:37, 9 October 2008 (UTC)