I couldn't help it being April Fool's, but seriously, the sections Peer review#Peer review and software development and Peer review#U.S. government peer review policies specifically need to be taken a look at to get this article to GA and then FA.--Jorfer 15:46, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- For me, the biggest issue in the article that needs to be addressed is the overwhelming emphasis on how peer review works in the sciences with much less emphasis given to PR in the humanities and social sciences. --Myke Cuthbert 01:54, 2 April 2007 (UTC)