| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion has been closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I'm planning to nominate it for a featured list status. Any feedback is welcome! Thank you.
Best wishes, Soulbust (talk) 00:46, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
- Hello Soulbust,
- I have two problems with the article:
- It's not clear what the cut off for a video to get on the list is. I am aware that it is a dynamic list but I feel there should be a clear method for a video to get on the list.
- The red bars to split the years doesn't look the best. I would suggest a gray or more bland colour it just sticks out to much in my opinion.
- Other than those two points the article looks good to me. — RealFakeKimT 13:22, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, RealFakeKim,
- Thank you for your peer review. I really appreciate it. So, I changed the red to a gray, and I agree it makes it have a smoother visual aesthetic. As for the cut off for a video to be on the list, I'm basically only including videos that have been sourced by reliable third-party sources/outlets. So, either the videos are embedded in articles by media outlets, or if a source's article only includes a hyperlink to the video, then the source should have an accompanying description of the video. When I go out and locate sources, I've observed that the latter is much less common to occur. Again, thank you for the peer review. I appreciate it! Best wishes, Soulbust (talk) 15:28, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- Ok good to know. Good luck going forward! — RealFakeKimT 15:45, 3 May 2020 (UTC)