| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion is closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I am trying to make every article about the Solar System's planets and their major moons a featured article. I'd really appreciate it if you can suggest and comment on what the article needs to be featured. I don't care how long it will take.
Thanks, foobarbaz 03:51, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
GWL
editI just came to this article because a friend of mine told me she nicknamed me Phobos back then, and I notice this is on PR! I'm not a space editor typically, but here's what I get from a quick read. GeraldWL 06:43, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- Typically citations aren't put in leads because it's expected for as much information as possible to be put in the article body. This is unless there's controversial claims or quotes. Same case with infoboxes, though the IPA citations make sense.
- One of the FAC criteria is comprehensiveness, and it's odd seeing an article about the SS with only 115 references. It's also a relatively quick read, but I believe much more has been put out on Phobos. The article itself still is B-class, so I think some more research should be done, then nominate it to GA-class-- people don't typically go for FAC directly due to the high scrutiny.
- There are several citation needed tags and inconsistent tags-- these need to be resolved.
Closing note: The nominator has not edited Wikipedia for a month. When they return, and resolve the comments above, they can open a new PR. Z1720 (talk) 01:00, 12 October 2023 (UTC)