Wikipedia:Peer review/Politics and Prose/archive1

Politics and Prose

I'm considering going through WP:FAC for the first time ever, and I'd love to have a full peer review done before I jump into the lion's den. Specifically I'd love for the article to be compared against the featured article criteria.

Thanks, Nomader (talk) 17:14, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Comments by Eddie891

FA criteria:

1. It is—
   1. well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard;
   2. comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context;
   3. well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature. Claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate;
   4. neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias; and
   5. stable: it is not subject to ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process. ✓ Pass
2. It follows the style guidelines, including the provision of—
   1. a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections;
   2. appropriate structure: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical section headings;✓ Pass and
   3. consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using either footnotes (<ref>Smith 2007, p. 1.</ref>) or Harvard referencing (Smith 2007, p. 1) ✓ Pass—see citing sourcesfor suggestions on formatting references. The use of citation templates is not required.
3. Media. It has images and other media, where appropriate, with succinct captions, and acceptable copyright status. Images follow the image use policy. Non-free images or media must satisfy the criteria for inclusion of non-free content and be labeled accordingly. ✓ Pass
4. Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style. ✓ Pass

I am not sure about the others. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 00:49, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, Eddie! Nomader (talk) 17:24, 15 December 2017 (UTC)