| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because it needs some more attention by experts of the topic.
Thanks, Borsoka (talk) 05:35, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Note: It is somewhat unlikely that experts on this topic will be browsing at WP:PR. I doubt there are that many. If you need their co-operation and can identify them, a direct approach would probably be more fruitful. Brianboulton (talk) 00:46, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
- Dear Brianboulton, I left a message on the relevant wikiproject's talk page when I listed the article for peer review. Borsoka (talk) 02:40, 3 December 2013 (UTC)