Wikipedia:Peer review/Protactinium/archive2

Protactinium

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because this article has the potential to be an FA-class article. I would like some comments on where it can improve before I submit it for FAC.

Thanks, ¹⁴¹ Pr {contribs} 19:47, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest using {{sfn}} citations for Greenwood source. Source [7] is a bare URL PDF that needs formatting. Sanglahi86 (talk) 01:12, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

~~What is the lead image? is it a ball or a microscope image? We need a caption.~~

How do you add a caption? ¹⁴¹ Pr {contribs} 12:04, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you have to edit Template:Infobox element/symbol-to-top-image/caption. That is very obscure! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:22, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is! I've added one now. ¹⁴¹ Pr {contribs} 16:37, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

~~"brevium" should probably be in quotes and not italic. brevium appears to be a redirect to Isotopes_of_protactinium#Protactinium-234m, so you could link it.~~
~~Unclear sentence: "Tantalum's heavier analogue was later found to be the transuranic element dubnium – which, however, does not react like tantalum, but like protactinium."~~
~~Dmitri Mendeleev's 1871 periodic table should be bigger so we can read Th and U.~~
Physical properties: there is a comparison, but no values given in the text. Most values are in the infobox, but not all. Please add the numeric values of properties to text. Especially since the infobox is mostly devoid of references, it is important to have text with references.
~~Please use chem2 and not chem template.~~
~~Poor English usage in "allows to improve" and "allowed to reconstruct"~~
How much is normally present in the human body?

I couldn't find any sources talking about how much Pa is present in the human body. ¹⁴¹ Pr {contribs} 12:04, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:25, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Praseodymium-141: It has been over a month since you have commented on the above. Are you still working on this? Z1720 (talk) 21:22, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I completely forgot about this peer review. I'll fix the comments and quickly as possible, although I am busy in real life. ¹⁴¹ Pr {contribs} 17:10, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Praseodymium-141: It has been another month and this PR hasn't received further comments. Can this be closed? Z1720 (talk) 21:18, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, we can close the review. ¹⁴¹ Pr {contribs} 06:28, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]