Wikipedia:Peer review/Puella Magi Madoka Magica/archive4

Puella Magi Madoka Magica

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because I'm planning to send this article to FAC. I've never done a FAC before and I've already asked for help from other users on the process, but in the meantime, while preparing for the nomination, I just want to make sure that the article is ready. If there are still any suggestions this has before I can take it to FA, please list them here.

Thanks, Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:56, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would advise you to avoid the reception structure to be like "X says this, Y says this and instead come with generalization. See Sasuke Uchiha's reception section which went through a major rewrite during a review. Remember to talk about all of the series' aspects there too like music. Other than that, I would also suggest you to ask for a copyedit since the prose's quality is often commented in FACs.Tintor2 (talk) 01:24, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

EDIT: I forgot about possible scholars' response. User talk:122.108.141.214 helped me a lot with it while working in the Captain Tsubasa article.Tintor2 (talk) 01:35, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]