| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion is closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I simply wish to see what could be improved! I also wonder if this could be good enough for an A-class assessment
Cheers to all, TheWikiToby (talk) 05:00, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I would like to inform you that WP:VG, which this article falls under, does not assess A-class per WP:VG/A. The only next step from GA would be FA. λ NegativeMP1 19:45, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Added to the FAC PR sidebar. Please consider reviewing other PRs. Z1720 (talk) 17:34, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- @NegativeMP1: This has been open for over a month without comment. Are you still interested in receiving comments? Z1720 (talk) 01:20, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- I believe you meant to mention TheWikiToby, I didn't start this review. If you meant to ask if I had any further comments for this review, I never had any intentions of reviewing this article beyond my heads-up comment related to WP:VG not assessing A-class. λ NegativeMP1 01:36, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, I might as well. TheWikiToby (talk) 01:45, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- @NegativeMP1: This has been open for over a month without comment. Are you still interested in receiving comments? Z1720 (talk) 01:20, 30 May 2024 (UTC)