| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion is closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I am looking to get this article to FA and I am seeking a pre-FA peer review. The article was recently promoted to GA and I have never been through the FAC process, so any help to thoroughly comb through the article before starting that process would be greatly helpful.
Thanks, — Mhawk10 (talk) 06:33, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
@Mhawk10: It's been over a month since this PR was posted. Are you still interested in receiving feedback? If so, I suggest seeking a FA mentor who can comment on this PR and give feedback on what to expect in an FAC. You can also seek the advice of editors who have recently written similar FAs or the article's Wikiprojects. If you are not interested in feedback anymore, can you close this PR? Thanks. Z1720 (talk) 19:47, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
@Z1720: I am still interested in this receiving a full peer review, yes. I’m generally unfamiliar with the FA process, so I think an FA mentor is going to be helpful—thank you for making me aware of this! I’m going to keep the PR open, since I am still looking for feedback, but I will be sure to check out that page. — Mhawk10 (talk) 20:02, 14 April 2022 (UTC)