Wikipedia:Peer review/Rise Against discography/archive1

Rise Against discography

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because I've been sitting on this page for too long. Just a few minutes ago I did a cleanup on the lead, and I feel it's close to FLC, but I'd like to get some eyes on it if possible.

Thanks, Famous Hobo (talk) 04:54, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by DannyMusicEditor

"recording The Unraveling in 2001, and Revolutions Per Minute in 2003" ~~recording~~ releasing

Done

" In addition to becoming the band's first album to reach the Billboard 200, where it peaked at 136, ..." how about number 136?

Done

" It's third single, "Savior",..." Its, not it's

Done

Might want to mention its ceritifications in the band's home country (America), so mention the Gold success of "Re-Education" (don't see that one mentioned here at all, which is an important one) and the Platinum status of "Savior". Same thing with "Prayer of the Refugee" (Platinum) and maybe even "Swing Life Away" (Gold), in their respective sections. Also mention how Siren Song, Sufferer, and Appeal went Gold in the US.

I'm working on this

Do you know how many records Rise Against has sold to date? Put that after the lead sentence. Generally, for my first paragraph, I think a good idea is: Opening statement + brief formation + optional brief style + total records. But at least have the total records sold information.

Surprisingly, I've never been able to find their total number of sales. Even the band's website doesn't mention their sales

"[Endgame] and remains their most commercially successful album to date." This is incorrect, commercial success by default refers to how many have been sold. Reword so it's clear you're referring to its chart success that was > all the other albums.

Fixed

Might need someone else to comment on refs, I don't know where they're necessary in a list's lead. The rest of it seems fine. dannymusiceditor ^{Speak up!} 13:39, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review Danny! I've fixed all but one point, which will be addressed later tonight. Famous Hobo (talk) 17:01, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]