Article (Edit|History) • Article talk (Edit|History) • Watch articleWatch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because I have been working on this for a few days, and it already looks better. I have added an infobox, added some info about banning of his books, footnotes, etc. I would like to know where is could be improved, so I could get it up to at least a Good Article.


Thanks,

Soxred93 | talk count bot 21:23, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]