Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I want to get it through to FA by the end of the year. It's just passed a GAN, and the previous PR has mostly been implemented, but I'm looking for another set of eyes before I nominate it to FAC.
Thanks, Sceptre (talk) 20:57, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
- Hey, I was in the middle of a copyedit and I've misplaced the notes I had made on paper. I should have finished the copyedit by tommorow. Sceptre (talk) 23:57, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
- And done. Sceptre (talk) 00:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)