Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I wanted to help this article reach GA review.
Last Peer Review wasn't reviewed.
Thanks, Funbeta 11:56, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Comments from LT910001
editI'm sorry that you've had to wait so long, Funbeta. Having read the article, I'd say that it is well-sourced and relatively clearly written. The "features" section is a little short and maybe the two subsections should be rolled into one. There are many other good articles about buildings you can view here: Wikipedia:Good_articles/Art_and_architecture to see what other editors have done. I'd suggest you nominate for GA and deal with any problems that arise there, as this article is definitely well on its way. Kind regards, --LT910001 (talk) 00:03, 7 June 2014 (UTC)