Wikipedia:Peer review/Salt Lake City, Utah/archive4

Salt Lake City, Utah

This article has been peer reviewed several times before and has been nominated for FAC several times before as well. I was working to improve the article again to FA status when an anon submitted it for FA without submitting it for peer review here. Many people said it was very close. The culture section has been fixed up dramatically, almost all of the lists have been turned to prose, and the formatting has improved quite a bit since then. I still don't know what to do about the many mistagged images or the notes, however.

Previous peer reviews: Wikipedia:Peer review/Salt Lake City, Utah/archive1, Wikipedia:Peer review/Salt Lake City, Utah/archive2, Wikipedia:Peer review/Salt Lake City, Utah/archive3.

I feel that this is closer to FA than it has ever been before, and I believe it just needs one last peer review before it could actually become a FA. bob rulz 02:46, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The temperture table is quite good, but it says its for the airport. Even although, I'd assume, the airport is close-by, airport and city weather differ. Of course, only slighty. So, even although it's something very minor, it might be a bit useless. ^KILO-_LIMA 17:35, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, most official weather observations are taken at the airport, and the only official weather observations for Salt Lake City are taken at the airport. bob rulz 22:34, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The only thing I see as wrong with it (and the only reason I did not give support) was User:Carnildo's objections about the pictures (see them here) . That is a MAJOR problem, and I'm absolutely sure that this won't pass FAC until this is resolved. Everything else looks --Trevdna 19:13, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All of the image problems have been taken care of. Each photo page included a link to where it was from; all of them were public entities (.edu,.gov). I went through and checked them for accuracy. The majority of them were photographers hired by the government with public funds. 71.213.19.160 05:18, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to ask Carnildo about the images just to make sure. Not all images from public entities (e.g. a public university) is in the public domain (one can make sure by reading the copyright disclaimers, if one can be found). Only images created by the federal government are unquestionably in the public domain. I ran into a problem where an image taken from an university's website was objected to during FAC. However, you could try to decrease the number of images in the article (a minor style issue, but this reduces clutter), which could limit the problem of image copyrights. Pentawing^Talk 05:59, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]