| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion has been closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I'd like to take a shot in submitting the article for GA status; it was demoted from FA status many years ago. Although it was previously peer reviewed, I need to know if the article still falls short in meeting the requirements.
Thanks, Bluesphere 13:47, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Bluesphere thanks for your edits to improve WP and this article! I've had a look at this. As you probably know, good articles are reviewed against six criteria (WP:GA?). Here are some thoughts:
- This article needs to provide reliable sources to back up its statements. There are a lot of times where no source provided... this will prove a big stumbling block.
- Secondly, content in "2013-2015" needs to be written in paragraphs rather than a list of points. This will relate to the "Well written criteria". Sarah seems to have achieved an awful lot, however because this is an article, the thoughts in it need to be organised somehow.
- This article uses too many wikilinks (links between articles). Each topic only needs to be provided once... so no two words should link to the same article. I note this is present with the Phillipines and also with several artists' names
- "Life and career" and "Personal life" seem to have duplicate scope. That said as is written, her life seems heavily intertwined with her singing career. One option would be to move personal life details away from "Career" and then rename that section. Another option would be to move personal life into life & career, although it may be lost in the sea of her achievements
I hope this helps. Good luck! --Tom (LT) (talk) 22:53, 27 January 2017 (UTC)