| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because as with the purpose of peer review, this article needs additional opinions and consideration to move on. For the most part, the article has remained fairly stagnant over the past couple of years and could benefit from outside help.
Thanks, SteveCof00 "suggestion box" 09:49, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
- This is a challenging article – the topic is large and difficult to outline, it might easily grow too large and it is difficult to compress it without making it too generic. Here are few improvement ideas which came to my mind:
- More inline citations (as pointed out in few places).
- The comments see article in the infobox don't help information seeking readers too much as the article is very large. It is very difficult to spot the right pieces of information in it. I have solved the problem with links as in this article and find it quite practical. I don't know if the practice follows Wikipedia style guidelines though.
- I hope you find my comments helpful. --Gwafton (talk) 17:30, 22 May 2014 (UTC)