| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion is closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review becaus I am looking to get it to FA status. Several years ago, I worked on this article and got it to GA status; as it has been some time since it was last reviewed I would like someone other than me to take a look at it and give feedback before I nominate it for FAC.
Thanks, Balon Greyjoy (talk) 06:18, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Comments by CactiStaccingCrane (talk)
edit@Balon Greyjoy: Looks like this place is pretty empty for a while, so I just gonna step in and review it :) CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 01:35, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
- References at the end of ... at the start of Expedition 26. are spaced weirdly
- Last sentence at the lede should be moved, it broke the lede coherence
- 1 or 2-sentences paragraphs should be merged
- ...
@CactiStaccingCrane: in case they forgot about this. Z1720 (talk) 22:04, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Balon Greyjoy: I am not sure if CactiStaccingCrane is returning. I suggest that you look for other reviewers to look at this by posting in Wikiprojects and asking experienced FA writers to comment. Are you still interested in receiving comments on this or should we close this PR? Z1720 (talk) 18:09, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- It's fine if you want to close this PR; I don't foresee any more comments coming. Thanks! Balon Greyjoy (talk) 07:02, 16 February 2022 (UTC)