Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed. |
I've listed this article for a peer review because I would like to see where does it stand now and what could be improved.
Thanks, Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 13:38, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi Sadko, I would focus on improving the sourcing of the article. There are many statements not supported by inline citations. It's possible that support for these statements can be found in the references already cited, so this may entail a great amount of reading from a long list of references. There are also cleanup tags to address. Best, Oldsanfelipe2 (talk) 17:47, 16 January 2020 (UTC)