| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion has been closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I believe it should be re-evaluated from stub to a higher rating. Also I'd like to receive comments on how I can improve the article. I have a COI (I am a Professor at ShanghaiTech)...
Thanks, Blaklumm (talk) 06:10, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
- I've re-assessed the article to class C. It will need better referencing to be upgraded further. Thanks for improving the article! -Zanhe (talk) 08:23, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
- Some comments:
- Not a fan of several references and lists in the intro: see if university affiliations can be worked into a separate section or integrated with the body. Definitely move each reference to immediately follow the affiliation it refers to.
- I'd reverse the order of the Timeline section, and consider building it into a more narrative History section.
- Academics section needs more sourcing and your COI shows through in this section with weasel words.
- Love the images, I'd move the one of the tower into the infobox and the panorama of the campus into the Campus section using Template:Wide image.
- Agree with the above reviewer, needs more references and information, closing review as C-class. Great work overall, keep it up! TritonsRising (talk) 21:19, 21 August 2017 (UTC)