| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because…
I want to see if there needs to be further improvement. And then I hope the article can be rated.
Thanks, Yhjow (talk) 09:54, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- Hello! What an interesting article. I've rated this as C class, because although it is quite comprehensive, it is quite lacking in sources. I think a good suggestion to improve this article would be find some good sources and use these to support what is written in the article. These might include books, magazine or news articles, or other published sources. I think this will help improve the article's breadth and help support its claims. I hope you can improve this article because it certainly has a core of quite good-quality, solid content. Kind regards, LT90001 (talk) 12:43, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
sure.. will need to dig out sources. (Yhjow (talk) 19:03, 4 October 2013 (UTC))