Wikipedia:Peer review/Stargazy pie/archive1

Stargazy pie

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because I feel that it might add a humorous twist to the normal FA's while it is still written quite well with the good article stamp, along with it being quite innocent in the fact that it's just a pie. (even if it's got fish sticking out of it)

Regards, Palmtreegames, Looking for a better signature. (talk) 15:09, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

STANDARD NOTE: I have added this PR to the Template:FAC peer review sidebar to get quicker and more responses. When this PR is closed, please remove it from the list. Also, consider adding the sidebar to your userpage to help others discover pre-FAC PRs, and please review other articles in that template. And, since you are still seeking your first successful FAC, I suggest seeking a FA mentor and start reviewing FACs now to build goodwill among the FAC regulars. Z1720 (talk) 01:39, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Palmtreegames: This has been open for a month without comment. Are you still interested in receiving feedback? Z1720 (talk) 21:20, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I’ve just been very busy, I am still looking for comment. Palmtreegames, Looking for a better signature. (talk) 01:32, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I recommend posting a request for reviews on the Wikiprojects attached to this article, and to seek out a FA mentor. Z1720 (talk) 19:30, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Palmtreegames: It has been another month since this has been opened. Can this be closed? Z1720 (talk) 00:04, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Still waiting for comment. Palmtreegames, Looking for a better signature. (talk) 16:31, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from TechnoSquirrel69

Hey Palmtreegames, thanks for sticking around at this PR! This seems like a fun little article to review, so here are some suggestions. (Citation numbers from this revision)

Citation 2 is now a dead link.
Citation 4 fails verification. I'm not sure if there are parts that aren't loading out of the archive or something, but it probably needs to be fixed.
At risk of stating the obvious here, but citation 7 is marked with {{Better source needed}}. This source seems like a pretty strange one to me, and is written more in the tone of a fairy tale than a news article. Is this simply a re-publication of the legend? I'd recommend replacement or removal either way.
MOS:REPEATLINK allows for the linking of terms at the start of each section. Due to the size of the article, I think every section might be overkill, but things such as Tom Bawcock's Eve in § Description could probably be linked for convenience. Up to you, though.
The image caption "The pilchards must retain their heads" needs a citation.
When exactly was "An older feast..." that the prose refers to?
Citation 18 is missing an access date. It also looks like an unreliable source, but I can't be sure.
Strike citation 19 as it's redundant.
The paragraph on Jim Causley is unsourced.
Citation 20 should be replaced or removed as Discogs is not a reliable source.

Other than that, I think this article looks good to go to FAC, can't wait to see this on the main page as a TFA! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 18:31, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, neat, awesome! Palmtreegames, Looking for a better signature. (talk) 21:25, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Palmtreegames: it's been a month since you got the above comments. Did you address the above and are looking for more comments, or can this be closed? Z1720 (talk) 00:48, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Z1720: man I'm trying, this is some advanced editing, I'm trying to figure it out still. I'm trying to fix it. Palmtreegames, Looking for a better signature. (talk) 16:39, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Palmtreegames: There's no rush, I just wanted to make sure that this wasn't abandoned. Take your time. Z1720 (talk) 16:41, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Palmtreegames: Feel free to reach out with additional questions or comments if you have them. I'm happy to help! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 16:58, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

well in that case, how do I remove citations? Palmtreegames, Looking for a better signature. (talk) 17:16, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do you want to delete a citation entirely? If so, you can simply remove the <ref>...</ref> tags in the source, or delete it as if it's normal text in the VisualEditor. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 17:21, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Query from Z1720

@Palmtreegames: It has been a month since the last comment, and this has been open since May. Is this ready to be closed and possibly nominated to FAC, or are you still looking for more comments? Z1720 (talk) 23:18, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

when it's closed, can i still work on the article in question t make it look cleaner? Palmtreegames, Looking for a better signature. (talk) 18:47, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]