This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because it has reached gridlock
Thanks, Paul75 (talk) 01:17, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Some outside advice would be appreciated
- This article I'd rather not have been taken to peer-review yet, as I stated on its talk page, which you obviously saw. And I'm not truly able to edit right now, as you also know.
So what, yeah, you're going to try making changes while I'm not there? Great heads up (sarcasm evident). As if you care for this article anyway. Flyer22 (talk) 02:42, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Peer review is not for dispute resolution so I am archiving this per the Peer review Request removal policy. Sorry and please try WP:RfC or other dispute resolution processes. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 03:05, 25 April 2008 (UTC)