Wikipedia:Peer review/Suzuka (manga)/archive1

Suzuka (manga)

I have been working towards getting this article up to GA standards. Any suggestions how to make this article better would be appreciated. (Duane543 00:07, 28 July 2007 (UTC))

Automated Peer Review

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.^[?]

I think the lead is decent, but I'm still open to suggestion to make it better. (Duane543 18:36, 30 July 2007 (UTC))

• Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.^[?]

Only linked full dates per linking to allow readers' date preferences. (Duane543 14:12, 29 July 2007 (UTC))

• If there is not a free use image in the top right corner of the article, please try to find and include one.^[?]

One in the infobox.(Duane543 14:12, 29 July 2007 (UTC))

• Per Wikipedia:What is a featured article?, Images should have concise captions.^[?]

Done. (Duane543 14:12, 29 July 2007 (UTC))

• <Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space -   between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 100 meter, use 100 meter, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 100 meter.^[?]

Fixed. (Duane543 14:12, 29 July 2007 (UTC))

• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.^[?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Davnel03 13:37, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

2nd Automated Peer Review

After those edits, this is what I get back from the Peer Review this time:

• Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.^[?]
• Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.^[?]
• If there is not a free use image in the top right corner of the article, please try to find and include one.^[?]
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.^[?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Davnel03 20:35, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

The Rambling Man

Right, my ideas before you go for GA.

• Wikilink full dates, e.g. 6 July 2005 -> 6 July, 2005

Returned the dates as they were before (Duane543 20:11, 31 July 2007 (UTC))

• Don't superscript th as in 24th.

Done (Duane543 20:11, 31 July 2007 (UTC))

• Trim external links per WP:EL

Removed 3 external links (Duane543 20:11, 31 July 2007 (UTC))

• Not keen on the formatting in the Characters section, looks untidy...

If you are talking about the space between them, it's because I used a break tag so make the images to go in the layout the way I wanted. Also I can't compress the images smaller because they don't look right. (Duane543 20:11, 31 July 2007 (UTC))

But it's a good article, so not far from being a good article! The Rambling Man 16:46, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Dates

Per Wikipedia:Context, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006 (or 15 January2006). Kazu-kun 17:42, 31 July 2007 (UTC)