| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to see how this article fares on the quality scale; effectively, I'm getting two lots of creative feedback at the same time as it is currently undergoing DYK.
Thanks, Launchballer 00:14, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Comment: This article is at present little more than a stub. It needs rather a lot more work before it is ready for a peer review which, as the WP:PR page makes clear, is intended for articles in a reasonably advanced state of development. It might be a good idea if you go to WP:GA or WP:FAC, where you will find plenty of well-developed song articles that you can use as models if you really want to develop this one. Brianboulton (talk) 22:53, 14 June 2013 (UTC)