| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because… still needs help.
Thanks, Greg Heffley 20:49, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
Finetooth comments: It looks to me like some of the suggestions made in the first peer review have not been addressed. For example, the article still has blank sections, still needs proofreading, and still has sourcing problems. I would suggest looking over that first peer review again for more ideas for improvement.
- It's often helpful to look at articles rated GA or higher to see how other editors have handled similar topics. You can find a list of GA articles on computing and technology at WP:GA/ET.
- Many claims in the article are not supported by inline citations to reliable sources. Please see WP:V and WP:RS for guidelines.
- Some of the citations are incomplete. Citations to web pages should include author, title, publisher, date of publication, URL, and date of most recent access if all of those are known or can be found.
- When you have made all of the improvements to the article that you can, you might ask for copyediting help from WP:GOCE.
Hope this helps. Finetooth (talk) 20:43, 10 November 2011 (UTC)