Wikipedia:Peer review/Tamaraw/archive1

Tamaraw

Hi I just followed the to-do list given to me by a fellow Pinoy Wikipedian. We managed to fix all but one citation (we didn't go through the DENR people though) and I think the spelling is ok.

These is what the article needs:

Comments: Is it GA worthy?

Contributions: Images, we only managed to get two free images

--Lenticel ^(talk) 02:14, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Automated Peer Review

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question. *Consider adding more links to the article; per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) and Wikipedia:Build the web, create links to relevant articles.^[?]

Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.^[?]

~~If there is not a free use image in the top right corner of the article, please try to find and include one.^[?]~~

I think all of these were addressed --Lenticel ^(talk) 10:12, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

*Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space -   between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 0 centimeters, use 0 centimeters, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 0 centimeters.^[?]

Fixed by Shrumster--Lenticel ^(talk) 09:58, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

*Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), please spell out source units of measurements in text; for example, the Moon is 380,000 kilometres (240,000 mi) from Earth.^[?] Specifically, an example is 13.5 cm.

did not find any abbreviated units --Lenticel ^(talk) 09:58, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

*Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.^[?]

adressed --Lenticel ^(talk) 09:58, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

*There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.

- ~~might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please ~~strike~~ this comment).^[?]~~

*Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: behavior (A) (British: behaviour), behaviour (B) (American: behavior), meter (A) (British: metre), defense (A) (British: defence), ization (A) (British: isation), analyse (B) (American: analyze), gray (A) (British: grey).

Made all words set to American spelling --Lenticel ^(talk) 09:58, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.^[?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Davnel03 12:04, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request for comment. Would the article as it is, pass FAC without having that many images? Shrumster 20:33, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]