This peer review discussion has been closed.
This article has had two recent failed FA nominations - I think it has got close but it just isnt quite there. One reviewer has said it is POV, and others have picked up on other issues in it. Hopefully I can have some help identifying these issues in more detail and someone can work with me to rectify them and bring this article up to FA status.
Thanks, Flymeoutofhere (talk) 18:55, 2 March 2008 (UTC)