Wikipedia:Peer review/The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari/archive1
Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I previously worked to improve this article up to GA status and plan to submit it to FAC soon, but would like a thorough peer review by an outside party before doing so.
Thanks, — Hunter Kahn 14:22, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
- Going to do a more thorough review later but a quick drive-by has me noticing that the "Sequels, remakes and musical works" has Citation Needed tags to it. I think that entire section will have to have a rewrite but I expect that was part of the plan. GamerPro64 04:26, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
- Thought I would be doing a more in-depth review of the article but after reading the entire piece, the "Sequels, remakes and musical works" is the only part that needs to be overhauled. With that section there it lowers the quality of the article that it could damage its chances of retaining its GA status. Other than that the article looks solid. GamerPro64 00:50, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks, yeah, much of that content was added by other people after the GAN review. I'll look at it and improve it accordingly before moving on to FA. Thanks! — Hunter Kahn 01:27, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
- Thought I would be doing a more in-depth review of the article but after reading the entire piece, the "Sequels, remakes and musical works" is the only part that needs to be overhauled. With that section there it lowers the quality of the article that it could damage its chances of retaining its GA status. Other than that the article looks solid. GamerPro64 00:50, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
- GamerPro64, FYI, I've gone through the Sequels/Remakes section as per your suggestion. I've cleaned it up, copy edited it, restructured the section slightly, removed some information that lacked reliable sources, and added reliable sources in other cases. I think it's adequate now, but if you'd like to give a look at that section in particular and give any feedback, let me know. Or, if you think this peer request is complete now, that's fine as well. Thanks either way for your help! — Hunter Kahn 14:19, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- Yeah the section has been greatly improved. I think this Peer Review is done here. GamerPro64 21:45, 13 August 2019 (UTC)