Wikipedia:Peer review/Thunder Bay Transit/archive1

Thunder Bay Transit

I've listed this article for peer review because I have been putting a lot of work into it the last few months, but I think it is lacking something and I can't quite tell what that might be. I would also like someone other than myself to make sure there are no grammar or spelling errors, as we tend to be unable to spot our own mistakes.

Thanks,

vıdıoman (talk • contribs) 16:30, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think expanding the lead would be great. Excellent work so far, you improved the article a lot.Puchiko (talk • contribs • email) 16:00, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I've expanded the lead. Is there anything else?
  - I'm new to peer review, so I am not that good at reviewing yet. I haven't noticed any other problems though. Puchiko (talk • contribs • email) 19:02, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    - Thanks for the help anyway. :) vıdıoman (talk • contribs) 20:25, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, APR _t 00:53, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question. Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.^[?] Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space - ` ` between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 300 metres, use 300 metres, which when you are editing the page, should look like: `300 metres`.^[?] Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at Wikipedia:Guide to layout.^[?] Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.^[?] You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR _t 00:51, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure I have gotten the first two, but there might be a couple that slipped through. I've moved that here so I only have to reference one page.

Thanks for the help so far. It's fairly difficult as there are no other bus transit articles (relating to this type of bus transit) which are at good or featured status (more are barely more than stubs) so any help, especially regarding the prose, is greatly appreciated!! I'm going to do some more work on the history section as well, while ensuring that all links go to their proper destinations, I noticed that one source has been updated since it was accessed. vıdıoman (talk • contribs) 18:41, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]