Wikipedia:Peer review/Transcortical sensory aphasia/archive1
Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because…
I have been working with a group to better this article, transcortical sensory aphasia, as part of a project for our neuroscience class. We would greatly appreciate any and all feedback on how to achieve "Good Article" status.
Thanks, --Quallsk (talk) 04:14, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- Comments - no expert in the area but can provide a technical review.
- I don't think a link to "speech" is needed, that's a fairly basic word given the complex nature of this article.
- " and naming" what do you mean by this?
- "exhibit paraphasia. [2]" remove space before ref.
- "However, transcortical sensory aphasia..." you've already abbreviated it, so use TSA here. Apply hereinafter.
- "repetition of words. [3]" remove space before ref. Check others.
- "beginning speech therapy. Speech therapy methods" try to avoid the quick repetition of phrases like "speech therapy".
- Brain caption needs a period (it's a complete sentence).
- " heard.[1] [5]" avoid spaces between refs.
- " e.g. when " just me, but I'd prefer "for instance" over "e.g."
- Last sentence of Verbal comprehension section is unreferenced.
- "or uses words in " - "or use words in"
- Last three sentences of Imaging are unreferenced.
- "does not appear overnight" - takes a significant period of time, or something, this "overnight" speak is a wee bit colloquial.
- Wernicke's caption could be expanded a little to make it interesting and useful.
- You don't need to relink aphasia again, and I'm sure you don't need to link brain by this point.
- motor centers.[18] [19] - avoid spaces between refs
- Don't need See also for articles that you've already linked in this article (e.g. Aphasia etc).
- Ref 3 and ref 19 need an en-dash in the page range (per WP:DASH)
- Don't mix date format in the refs, DMY or MD,Y but be consistent.
- Refs 8, 9, 11 and 12 appear to have bare URLs, that will need to be addressed.