Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because the interpretation given in the "health issues" section is IMHO dubious (I removed a sentence which I believed was taken from a secondary improper source); the very recent paper quoted (Koeth et. al.) has had a huge impact in the mass media, and I believe many people would come to wikipedia to get more info on this substance. As this topic (nutritional factors of heart diseases) is highly controversial, I think bulletproof contents only shoulf figure in this article for the sake of public health.