I am looking for any advice on how to improve this article. Anything that can be thought of. The Filmaker 23:28, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, APR t 01:13, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
It looks very good generally, with plenty of references (the advantage of recent popular culture). The factiness subsection could be incorporated into somewhere else. There are the odd stubby paragraphs with only one or two sentences which should probably be linked. The final section about the correspondents dinner looks a bit odd with the text squeezed into the middle, so one of the images could be moved down a bit. Not a lot to say really, it's a great article. Trebor 21:21, 11 January 2007 (UTC)